From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:52:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed1d1e59-bb09-1497-9b09-62051b191f6e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717151705.18611-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
On 17/07/20 17:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> libFuzzer triggered the following assertion:
>
> cat << EOF | qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
> -nographic -monitor none -serial none \
> -qtest stdio -d guest_errors -trace pci\*
> outl 0xcf8 0x8400f841
> outl 0xcfc 0xebed205d
> outl 0x5d02 0xedf82049
> EOF
> pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
> hw/pci/pci.c:268: int pci_bus_get_irq_level(PCIBus *, int): Assertion `irq_num < bus->nirq' failed.
>
> This is because ich9_lpc_sci_irq() returns -1 for reserved
> (illegal) values, but ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update() considers
> it valid and store it in a 8-bit unsigned type. Then the 255
> value is used as GSI IRQ, resulting in a PIRQ value of 247,
> more than ICH9_LPC_NB_PIRQS (8).
>
> Fix by simply ignoring the invalid access (and reporting it):
>
> pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
> ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #3 is reserved
> pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x8086
> pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x29c08086
> ...
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> Fixes: 8f242cb724 ("ich9: implement SCI_IRQ_SEL register")
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1878642
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> RFC because I have no idea how to report the error. The LPC is on
> Device 31 Function 0. Should it trigger some error to the PCI bridge?
> I can't find that info in the ICH9 datasheet.
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
The patch is okay, but anything found by a fuzzer should really have a
qtest testcase.
Paolo
> ---
> include/hw/i386/ich9.h | 1 +
> hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> index a98d10b252..60483b16cd 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ typedef struct ICH9LPCState {
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK Q35_MASK(32, 15, 7)
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_RTE 0x1
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_DEFAULT 0x1
> +
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL 0x44
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN 0x80
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK Q35_MASK(8, 2, 0)
> diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> index cd6e169d47..5ed28a726c 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> #include "qemu/range.h"
> @@ -312,10 +313,12 @@ void ich9_generate_smi(void)
> cpu_interrupt(first_cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI);
> }
>
> +/* Returns -1 on error, IRQ number on success */
> static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> {
> - switch (lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
> - ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK) {
> + uint8_t sel = lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
> + ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK;
> + switch (sel) {
> case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_9:
> return 9;
> case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_10:
> @@ -328,6 +331,8 @@ static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> return 21;
> default:
> /* reserved */
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #%u is reserved\n", sel);
> break;
> }
> return -1;
> @@ -450,7 +455,7 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> {
> uint32_t pm_io_base = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_PMBASE);
> uint8_t acpi_cntl = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL);
> - uint8_t new_gsi;
> + int new_gsi;
>
> if (acpi_cntl & ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN) {
> pm_io_base &= ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK;
> @@ -461,6 +466,9 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> ich9_pm_iospace_update(&lpc->pm, pm_io_base);
>
> new_gsi = ich9_lpc_sci_irq(lpc);
> + if (new_gsi == -1) {
> + return;
> + }
> if (lpc->sci_level && new_gsi != lpc->sci_gsi) {
> qemu_set_irq(lpc->pm.irq, 0);
> lpc->sci_gsi = new_gsi;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 15:17 [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-27 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed1d1e59-bb09-1497-9b09-62051b191f6e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).