From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epOB5-0001xe-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:59:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epOB1-00055X-H2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:59:03 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]:43293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epOB1-000559-BO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:58:59 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f6so3984456pgs.10 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:58:59 -0800 (PST) References: <20180223153636.29809-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:58:55 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180223153636.29809-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/31] Add ARMv8.2 half-precision functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , qemu-arm@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/23/2018 07:36 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > Now that the softfloat re-factoring has been merged I re-based this > directly from master. Alternatively you can grab the full tree from: > > https://github.com/stsquad/qemu/tree/arm-fp16-v3 > > I've tested with the following RISU test binaries: > > http://people.linaro.org/~alex.bennee/testcases/arm64.risu/testcases.armv8.2_hp.tar.xz > > Which now includes insn_FP1SRC.risu.bin which tests the final patch in > the series which wasn't being exercised by my previous set of tests. > > I've dropped the fp16 patch to both avoid the bikesheding but also > because I could achieve the same effect by running RISU with: > > -cpu cortex-a57 > > The changes are all relatively minor based on feedback. The details > are as usual included in the commit messages bellow ---. Unless I've missed something, that's the whole patch set reviewed. r~