From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr_pci: Create PCI-express root bus by default
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:10:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee1d7da4-373c-4be0-7e67-897a1c90042f@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161031025314.GJ18226@umbus.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4609 bytes --]
On 31/10/16 13:53, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:56:40 +1100
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> At the moment sPAPR PHB creates a root buf of TYPE_PCI_BUS type.
>>> This means that vfio-pci devices attached to it (and this is
>>> a default behaviour) hide PCIe extended capabilities as
>>> the bus does not pass a pci_bus_is_express(pdev->bus) check.
>>>
>>> This changes adds a default PCI bus type property to sPAPR PHB
>>> and uses TYPE_PCIE_BUS if none passed; older machines get TYPE_PCI_BUS
>>> for backward compatibility as a bus type is used in the bus name
>>> so the root bus name becomes "pcie.0" instead of "pci.0".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> What can possibly go wrong with such change of a name?
>>> From devices prospective, I cannot see any.
>>>
>>> libvirt might get upset as "pci.0" will not be available,
>>> will it make sense to create pcie.0 as a root bus and always
>>> add a PCIe->PCI bridge and name its bus "pci.0"?
>>>
>>> Or create root bus from TYPE_PCIE_BUS and force name to "pci.0"?
>>> pci_register_bus() can do this.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 5 +++++
>>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 5 ++++-
>>> include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> index 0b3820b..a268511 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> @@ -2541,6 +2541,11 @@ DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(2_8, "2.8", true);
>>> .driver = TYPE_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE, \
>>> .property = "mem64_win_size", \
>>> .value = "0", \
>>> + }, \
>>> + { \
>>> + .driver = TYPE_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE, \
>>> + .property = "root_bus_type", \
>>> + .value = TYPE_PCI_BUS, \
>>> },
>>>
>>> static void phb_placement_2_7(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t index,
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> index 7cde30e..2fa1f22 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> @@ -1434,7 +1434,9 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> bus = pci_register_bus(dev, NULL,
>>> pci_spapr_set_irq, pci_spapr_map_irq, sphb,
>>> &sphb->memspace, &sphb->iospace,
>>> - PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_NUM_PINS, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
>>> + PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), PCI_NUM_PINS,
>>> + sphb->root_bus_type ? sphb->root_bus_type :
>>> + TYPE_PCIE_BUS);
>>
>> Shouldn't we ensure that sphb->root_bus_type is either TYPE_PCIE_BUS or
>> TYPE_PCI_BUS ?
>
> Yes, I think so. In fact, I think it would be better to make the
> property a boolean that just selects PCI-E, rather than this which
> exposes qemu (semi-)internal type names on the comamnd line.
Sure, a "pcie-root" boolean property should do.
However this is not my main concern, I rather wonder if we have to have
pci.0 when we pick PCIe for the root.
>> Otherwise, if we pass something like:
>>
>> -global spapr-pci-host-bridge.root_bus_type=pcie
>>
>> we get the following not really explicit error:
>>
>> ERROR:/home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-spapr/qom/object.c:474:object_new_with_type: assertion failed: (type != NULL)
>>
>>> phb->bus = bus;
>>> qbus_set_hotplug_handler(BUS(phb->bus), DEVICE(sphb), NULL);
>>>
>>> @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ static Property spapr_phb_properties[] = {
>>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("pgsz", sPAPRPHBState, page_size_mask,
>>> (1ULL << 12) | (1ULL << 16)),
>>> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("numa_node", sPAPRPHBState, numa_node, -1),
>>> + DEFINE_PROP_STRING("root_bus_type", sPAPRPHBState, root_bus_type),
>>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>>> index b92c1b5..a4ee873 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct sPAPRPHBState {
>>> uint64_t dma64_win_addr;
>>>
>>> uint32_t numa_node;
>>> + char *root_bus_type;
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define SPAPR_PCI_MEM_WIN_BUS_OFFSET 0x80000000ULL
>>
>
--
Alexey
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 839 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 7:56 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr_pci: Create PCI-express root bus by default Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-10-28 10:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2016-10-31 2:53 ` David Gibson
2016-10-31 4:10 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2016-11-01 2:46 ` David Gibson
2016-11-15 14:02 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-11-17 2:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-11-18 6:11 ` David Gibson
2016-11-18 8:17 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-11-21 2:12 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-11-21 13:08 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-11-22 2:26 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-11-23 5:02 ` David Gibson
2016-11-25 14:36 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-12-02 3:37 ` David Gibson
2016-11-22 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2016-11-23 5:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson
2016-11-25 13:46 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-12-02 4:18 ` David Gibson
2016-12-02 5:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-02 5:50 ` David Gibson
2016-12-02 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-03 1:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-12-05 19:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Laine Stump
2016-12-05 20:54 ` Laine Stump
2016-12-07 3:34 ` David Gibson
2016-12-06 17:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrea Bolognani
2016-12-07 4:11 ` David Gibson
2016-12-07 16:42 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-12-13 12:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-13 13:15 ` Greg Kurz
2016-12-13 15:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-14 2:48 ` David Gibson
2016-12-14 12:02 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-14 2:46 ` David Gibson
2016-12-14 18:26 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-15 21:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-12-19 17:39 ` Andrea Bolognani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee1d7da4-373c-4be0-7e67-897a1c90042f@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).