From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nilrq-0006YT-1P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:43:18 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49139 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nilro-0006XU-Ok
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:43:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <jay.foad@gmail.com>) id 1Nilro-0003tN-9v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:43:16 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218]:57608)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jay.foad@gmail.com>) id 1Nilrn-0003tB-RJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:43:16 -0500
Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so640963bwz.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:43:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5581002200056h3b898e13xab4521fa311d2bdb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ee2e06e91002191024rc2914eeia8a772e2e096f8cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<f43fc5581002200056h3b898e13xab4521fa311d2bdb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:43:14 +0000
Message-ID: <ee2e06e91002200143g120c3d04jbe61e4e11e66804@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-sparc: fix --enable-debug build
From: Jay Foad <jay.foad@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> Yes, except for the Signed-off-by: line.

Do I need to resend it for that? And if so, does that make it PATCH v2
(even though the patch hasn't changed)?

Or can I just put the fixed Signed-off-by: line in a reply?

Thanks,
Jay.