From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: fam@euphon.net, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com,
Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] virtio: handle zoned backing devices
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:33:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eea2bb4e-813e-456b-8aa9-514f63c5057e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710110241.GB6501@localhost.localdomain>
On 10/07/19 13:02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Hm... Actually, file-posix implements .bdrv_check_perm and could just
> refuse attaching a parent there if it doesn't request a specific
> permission like BLK_PERM_SUPPORT_ZONED. That should give us the
> whitelist semantics through existing infrastructure.
I'd like Dmitry to have something more precise to base his work on. The
permissions system is really complicated and I never really wrapped my
head around it, so I need your help.
IIUC, blkconf_apply_backend_options would grow a new argument (like
"resizable") and that argument would add BLK_PERM_SUPPORT_ZONED to the
perm that blkconf_apply_backend_options passes to blk_set_perm. On the
other side raw_check_perm would say something like
if (is_zoned(s) && !(perm & BLK_PERM_SUPPORT_ZONED)) {
error_setg(....);
return -ENOTSUP;
}
Is this correct?
In addition, BLK_PERM_SUPPORT_ZONED would have to be a shared
permission, since it's possible to assign the same block device to
multiple scsi-block devices. So BLK_PERM_SUPPORT_ZONED would be added
unconditionally to shared_perm.
Paolo
ps: I have always thought that shared_perm is expressed the wrong way
and should have been "denied_perm". How hard would it be to change that
now?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-10 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-09 20:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] virtio: handle zoned backing devices Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-09 20:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: Add zoned device model property Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-09 20:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] raw: Recognize zoned backing devices Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-09 20:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] virtio-blk: Don't realize zoned block devices Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-09 20:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] hw/scsi: Don't realize zoned block devices for virtio-scsi legacy drivers Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-10 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] virtio: handle zoned backing devices Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-10 11:02 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-10 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-07-10 21:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-11 0:52 ` Dmitry Fomichev
2019-07-11 8:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eea2bb4e-813e-456b-8aa9-514f63c5057e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).