Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] s390x: sclp: boundary check

[Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>]

On 27.09.19 15:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> All sclp codes need to be checked for page boundary violations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/sclp.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> index 95ebfe7..73244c9 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,11 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
>          goto out_write;
>      }
>  
> +    if ((sccb + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)) > ((sccb & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE)) {
> +        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
> +        goto out_write;
> +    }
> +
>      sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>  out_write:
>      cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb,
>

checkpatch complains about the line length, but splitting makes it really
less readable.

Thanks applied.