From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block: document semanatics of bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:03:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef505f48-f876-743f-922c-1faddce3051d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808091330.GB9393@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]
On 08/08/2017 04:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:39:29AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> On Fri, 08/04 16:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> This is odd. In the bdrv_aligned_readv() it looks very much like
>>> we'll reference qiov->niov, if bytes != 0, so if qiov was NULL we
>>> would crash.
>>
>> It doesn't make sense if read doesn't have an iov, where should the data be
>> placed? :)
>>
> We can't remove it from the bdrv_co_pwritev() function, but we can remove
> it from bdrv_co_pwritev block driver callback AFAICT.
Sounds like a separate cleanup series to remove the length parameter for
both read and write (since we have write_zeroes), for the 2.11
timeframe. You're right that the block layer does not have to have
quite the same interface as the driver callbacks.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-04 10:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: document semanatics of bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-04 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Eric Blake
2017-08-04 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-08-04 14:02 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-08-04 14:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-04 15:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Eric Blake
2017-08-04 15:49 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-08 2:39 ` Fam Zheng
2017-08-08 9:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-08 15:03 ` Eric Blake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef505f48-f876-743f-922c-1faddce3051d@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).