From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0hOL-0001gZ-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:44:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0h4g-0002e2-Io for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:26:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0gHc-0002ib-74 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:33:32 -0500 Received: from [66.249.92.207] (helo=uproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F0gMB-0003ZA-Nh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:38:15 -0500 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j40so189998ugd for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:30:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:30:49 +0100 From: G Portokalidis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] Qemu on dual-processor host Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I was wondering whether anyone has experience with installing Qemu on a dual-processor host? Reading about the problems some of you had with hyper-threading, i wonder if things become worse on multi-processor hosts? Cheers, Giorgos Portokalidis