From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT51t-0000Fa-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:37:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT51r-0007oa-Cs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:37:37 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:53332 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT51r-0007n6-75 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:37:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E28818F6EA for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:37:34 +0000 (UTC) References: <1525843212-31922-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <87bmch48w6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87d0wvkxwi.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:37:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d0wvkxwi.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for qemu-options* files in main directory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 13/06/2018 08:23, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>> Do you think you could still be available as (co-)maintainer of that new >>> section? If not, who are going to be the maintainers of that new >>> section? Paolo? Eric? Daniel? ...? >> Well, currently it's going through me. I'd add vl.c too, by the way. > vl.c has much more than just CLI parsing. It's pushing 4kSLOC... Not much more though. There is some main loop / runstate stuff which could be split to its own file, but it's perhaps 2-300 lines of code. The rest is main() and its dependencies. Actually 1/3rd of it is main(). :) > Splitting it up would be nice. As long as it's not, I guess the > pragmatic solution is to have multiple MAINTAINERS sections claim it: > existing "Main loop", proposed "CLI", ... That would work too.