From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Functional tests precache behaviour
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:21:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efbaccd1-9ef2-4aed-88ed-d6a2bcb7902b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBJJqtzQaTH_xcKK@redhat.com>
On 4/30/25 9:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:48:59AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> On 4/30/25 8:00 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 30/04/2025 16.34, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> $ ninja -C build precache-functional
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:20,382 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:23,131 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:25,870 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:25,871 - qemu-test - ERROR - https://archive.netbsd.org/
>>>> pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/gzimg/armv7.img.gz:
>>>> Download retries exceeded: skipping asset precache
>>>> $ echo $?
>>>> 0
>>>>
>>>> Since we silently skip the asset precaching, how can we identify that an
>>>> asset is not available anymore (temporarily or not)?
>>>> Should we rely on test itself failing when trying to download again this asset?
>>>
>>> The current logic fails hard for 404 errors, so if the asset is completely
>>> gone, we should notice it. For other error codes, we assume that it is only
>>> a temporary server problem that will hopefully be fixed on the server side
>>> sooner or later.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good.
>> Should we replicate this semantic when running the test itself?
>> It would be more useful to skip it because an asset is missing instead of
>> reporting an error, except if it's a 404 error.
>
> The tests already gracefully skip if one or more required assets
> are not available. See the 'setUp' method of QemuBaseTest
>
> if not self.assets_available():
> self.skipTest('One or more assets is not available')
>
>
> In the 404 case, the pre-cache step should fail and thus we shouldn't
> even get to running the test.
>
This is not the behaviour I observe (error, with server returning 503)
[1], thus my original email.
Maybe something is missing in the associated test, or in our test
infrastructure?
Nothing funky in the command line used, you can reproduce it with:
$ rm -rf ~/.cache/qemu build/
$ ./configure
$ ./build/pyvenv/bin/meson test -C build --setup thorough --suite
func-quick --suite func-thorough -t 5 --print-errorlogs func-ppc-ppc_40p
[1]
https://github.com/pbo-linaro/qemu-ci/actions/runs/14747788692/job/41398348905
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/runner/work/qemu-ci/qemu-ci/tests/functional/test_ppc_40p.py",
line 68, in test_openbios_and_netbsd
drive_path = self.ASSET_NETBSD71.fetch()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File
"/home/runner/work/qemu-ci/qemu-ci/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py",
line 175, in fetch
raise AssetError(self, "Download retries exceeded", transient=True)
qemu_test.asset.AssetError:
https://archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-7.1.2/iso/NetBSD-7.1.2-prep.iso:
Download retries exceeded
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 14:34 Functional tests precache behaviour Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 15:00 ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-30 15:48 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:21 ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2025-04-30 16:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:34 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:46 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-01 17:56 ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-01 21:26 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-03 20:21 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:22 ` Pierrick Bouvier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efbaccd1-9ef2-4aed-88ed-d6a2bcb7902b@linaro.org \
--to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).