qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Functional tests precache behaviour
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:21:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efbaccd1-9ef2-4aed-88ed-d6a2bcb7902b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBJJqtzQaTH_xcKK@redhat.com>

On 4/30/25 9:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 08:48:59AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> On 4/30/25 8:00 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 30/04/2025 16.34, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> $ ninja -C build precache-functional
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:20,382 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:23,131 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:25,870 - qemu-test - ERROR - Unable to download https://
>>>> archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/
>>>> gzimg/armv7.img.gz: HTTP error 503
>>>> 2025-04-30 07:23:25,871 - qemu-test - ERROR - https://archive.netbsd.org/
>>>> pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-9.0/evbarm-earmv7hf/binary/gzimg/armv7.img.gz:
>>>> Download retries exceeded: skipping asset precache
>>>> $ echo $?
>>>> 0
>>>>
>>>> Since we silently skip the asset precaching, how can we identify that an
>>>> asset is not available anymore (temporarily or not)?
>>>> Should we rely on test itself failing when trying to download again this asset?
>>>
>>> The current logic fails hard for 404 errors, so if the asset is completely
>>> gone, we should notice it. For other error codes, we assume that it is only
>>> a temporary server problem that will hopefully be fixed on the server side
>>> sooner or later.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good.
>> Should we replicate this semantic when running the test itself?
>> It would be more useful to skip it because an asset is missing instead of
>> reporting an error, except if it's a 404 error.
> 
> The tests already gracefully skip if one or more required assets
> are not available. See the 'setUp' method of QemuBaseTest
> 
>          if not self.assets_available():
>              self.skipTest('One or more assets is not available')
> 
> 
> In the 404 case, the pre-cache step should fail and thus we shouldn't
> even get to running the test.
> 

This is not the behaviour I observe (error, with server returning 503) 
[1], thus my original email.

Maybe something is missing in the associated test, or in our test 
infrastructure?

Nothing funky in the command line used, you can reproduce it with:
$ rm -rf ~/.cache/qemu build/
$ ./configure
$ ./build/pyvenv/bin/meson test -C build --setup thorough --suite 
func-quick --suite func-thorough -t 5 --print-errorlogs func-ppc-ppc_40p

[1] 
https://github.com/pbo-linaro/qemu-ci/actions/runs/14747788692/job/41398348905

Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
"/home/runner/work/qemu-ci/qemu-ci/tests/functional/test_ppc_40p.py", 
line 68, in test_openbios_and_netbsd
     drive_path = self.ASSET_NETBSD71.fetch()
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   File 
"/home/runner/work/qemu-ci/qemu-ci/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py", 
line 175, in fetch
     raise AssetError(self, "Download retries exceeded", transient=True)
qemu_test.asset.AssetError: 
https://archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-7.1.2/iso/NetBSD-7.1.2-prep.iso: 
Download retries exceeded

> 
> With regards,
> Daniel



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-30 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-30 14:34 Functional tests precache behaviour Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 15:00 ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-30 15:48   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:02     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:21       ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2025-04-30 16:29         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:34           ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:39             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-30 16:46               ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-01 17:56               ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-01 21:26                 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-03 20:21                   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-04-30 16:22   ` Pierrick Bouvier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efbaccd1-9ef2-4aed-88ed-d6a2bcb7902b@linaro.org \
    --to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).