qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] exec/memory_ldst: extract memory_ldst declarations from cpu-all.h
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:04:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efde9b68-fd8c-4e06-ab5e-6b1d4cf75332@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57612d65-aec0-4785-86c3-0c8d647af38a@linaro.org>

On 3/10/25 08:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 3/9/25 21:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> They are now accessible through exec/memory.h instead, and we make sure
>> all variants are available for common or target dependent code.
> ...
>> diff --git a/include/exec/memory_ldst.h.inc b/include/exec/memory_ldst.h.inc
>> index 92ad74e9560..74519a88de0 100644
>> --- a/include/exec/memory_ldst.h.inc
>> +++ b/include/exec/memory_ldst.h.inc
>> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
>>     * License along with this library; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>     */
>>    
>> -#ifdef TARGET_ENDIANNESS
>> +uint8_t glue(address_space_ldub, SUFFIX)(ARG1_DECL,
>> +    hwaddr addr, MemTxAttrs attrs, MemTxResult *result);
>>    uint16_t glue(address_space_lduw, SUFFIX)(ARG1_DECL,
>>        hwaddr addr, MemTxAttrs attrs, MemTxResult *result);
> 
> You shouldn't be exposing
> 
>     address_space_lduw
> 
> to common code, only
> 
>     address_space_lduw_be
>     address_space_lduw_le
> 
> etc.  I'm not sure what you're trying to do here.
> 
> 
> r~

Taking another look at this, I don't see how we can avoid to expose 
those functions to common code.

The goal of those first two patches is to break the dependency to cpu.h, 
which can't be included from common code, and thus prevent any common 
code wanting to do memory op to access it.

All the calls to ld*_phys() and address_space_*() are indeed done from 
code related to a target (some of it in hw/). However, as we now move 
those compilation units to common, they still need to be accessed. The 
semantic stays exactly the same.

 From what I understand, non endian versions are simply passing 
DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN as a parameter for address_space_ldl_internal, 
which will thus match the target endianness.

So what is the risk for common code to call this?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-11  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10  4:58 [PATCH 00/16] make system memory API available for common code Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 01/16] exec/memory_ldst: extract memory_ldst declarations from cpu-all.h Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 15:17   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:03     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-11  0:04     ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2025-03-11 14:40       ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 02/16] exec/memory_ldst_phys: extract memory_ldst_phys " Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-11  0:08   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 03/16] include: move target_words_bigendian() from tswap to bswap Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 15:21   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:05     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 04/16] exec/memory.h: make devend_memop target agnostic Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 15:25   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:04     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:30   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:38     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 05/16] qemu/bswap: implement {ld,st}.*_p as functions Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:08   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:14     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:37       ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:43         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:53           ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 17:09             ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 20:17               ` BALATON Zoltan
2025-03-10 20:31                 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 06/16] exec/cpu-all.h: we can now remove ld/st macros Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:39   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 16:45     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 07/16] codebase: prepare to remove cpu.h from exec/exec-all.h Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:22   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 08/16] exec/exec-all: remove dependency on cpu.h Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:29   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] exec/memory-internal: " Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:29   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 10/16] exec/ram_addr: " Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:29   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 11/16] system/kvm: make kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer() accessible for common code Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:30   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 12/16] exec/ram_addr: call xen_hvm_modified_memory only if xen is enabled Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:30   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 13/16] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:32   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 14/16] system/physmem: compilation unit is now common to all targets Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:32   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 15/16] system/memory: make compilation unit common Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:43   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 17:47     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:58       ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 18:04         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 18:10           ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 18:25             ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 18:27           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-03-10 18:38             ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10  4:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] system/ioport: " Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 17:43   ` Richard Henderson
2025-03-10 13:23 ` [PATCH 00/16] make system memory API available for common code BALATON Zoltan
2025-03-10 16:28   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 16:56     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 19:40       ` BALATON Zoltan
2025-03-10 20:26         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 21:02           ` BALATON Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efde9b68-fd8c-4e06-ab5e-6b1d4cf75332@linaro.org \
    --to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).