From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LGHot-00050p-0X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:53:59 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LGHor-00050d-Ee
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:53:58 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50457 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LGHor-00050a-B7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:53:57 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:39947)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LGHoq-0003KL-Pn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:53:57 -0500
Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3882884bwz.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f085eb030812261053q3c09be31t8aba8b1c985546de@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:53:52 -0600
From: "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] evdev_keycode_map
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0812251517qb583656ma28cf65fd406ad29@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d9c105ea0809241610g39c2e2dfn20c66c81de8af446@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081209224235.GA12529@kos.to> <20081210112845.GC22446@redhat.com>
	<493FD5DD.2020704@codemonkey.ws>
	<fb249edb0812251517qb583656ma28cf65fd406ad29@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 5:17 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/10 Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>:
>> Otherwise, non-X11 SDL platforms will stop building which certainly isn't
>> acceptable.
>
> You can have X11 support compiled in and not use it, SDL can be
> compiled with >1 backends.

I think that proper error checking will handle this case but it should
be tested.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Cheers
>
>
>