From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYYJo-0007q3-U2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:09:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYYJm-0007pr-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:09:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33859 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYYJm-0007po-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:09:22 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.188]:35982) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYYJm-0001JV-0x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:09:22 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z23so938619fkz.2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:09:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090215020126.GA9281@shareable.org> References: <4988AD96.6090308@codemonkey.ws> <20090213084023.GA1020@kos.to> <20090213163043.GJ18471@shareable.org> <4995A723.9010208@codemonkey.ws> <20090213190419.GB20328@shareable.org> <4997502D.1080401@codemonkey.ws> <20090215020126.GA9281@shareable.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:09:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports From: Anthony Liguori Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Have done, did you read the other thread? Yes, but your patch confused me (which is admittedly not hard). >> It's QEMU SVN delta 5005-5006, copied below. So why such an aggressive revert? Why not just revert the problematic changesets? Regards, Anthony Liguori