From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] linux-user: un-parent OBJECT(cpu) when closing thread
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:08:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f10fc88c-a47e-3f23-4f1f-ecda6d00637c@vivier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63402e61-a23b-6780-fec3-8a0fdf32520a@vivier.eu>
On 21/06/2022 20:17, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 10/06/2022 à 16:38, Alex Bennée a écrit :
>> While forcing the CPU to unrealize by hand does trigger the clean-up
>> code we never fully free resources because refcount never reaches
>> zero. This is because QOM automatically added objects without an
>> explicit parent to /unattached/, incrementing the refcount.
>>
>> Instead of manually triggering unrealization just unparent the object
>> and let the device machinery deal with that for us.
>>
>> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/866
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
>> index f55cdebee5..c413d32311 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
>> @@ -8566,7 +8566,7 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num,
>> abi_long arg1,
>> if (CPU_NEXT(first_cpu)) {
>> TaskState *ts = cpu->opaque;
>> - object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), "realized", false, NULL);
>> + object_unparent(OBJECT(cpu));
>> object_unref(OBJECT(cpu));
>> /*
>> * At this point the CPU should be unrealized and removed
>
> Applied to my linux-user-for-7.1 branch.
>
I remove it from the branch.
It breaks something with arm64 (only) target (any distros: stretch, sid, trusty, bionic),
the following LTP test cases fail:
bind04, bind05, fcntl34, fcntl34_64, fcntl36, fcntl36_64, inotify09, mmap18,
sched_setattr01, sched_getattr01, tgkill01, tgkill02, tgkill03, futex_wake02
For instance:
tst_test.c:1250: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
bind04.c:117: TINFO: Testing AF_UNIX pathname stream
bind04.c:150: TPASS: Communication successful
tst_test.c:1300: TBROK: Test killed by SIGSEGV!
Thanks,
Laurent
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 14:38 [RFC PATCH] linux-user: un-parent OBJECT(cpu) when closing thread Alex Bennée
2022-06-12 16:29 ` Laurent Vivier
2022-06-21 18:17 ` Laurent Vivier
2022-06-23 12:08 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f10fc88c-a47e-3f23-4f1f-ecda6d00637c@vivier.eu \
--to=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).