From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AF9C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47AC92133F for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="b0GZ0WbE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47AC92133F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58776 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKA58-0003oY-FG for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:48:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKA32-0002ak-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:46:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKA31-0003HK-KJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:46:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]:38519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKA31-0003Fw-8q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:46:43 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id w8so8660439plq.5 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:46:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0ff5FmsR2u8LjxZ8nFEDoYAUd9BJ03hHHC/rQe7hLs8=; b=b0GZ0WbEaRHhJ0WknwmPOiyjtBuU3Tvma9p/gVYqWlYJuKndMZXT96YY/vFe2L4HSo F/uAGbKxjDetNjS3vSv8EOjiEKd+u5dZSuLYKFq2cMjI6uN+xBRmTQV5A/XfIfCzO7+H 5Ocu9GdVrjVcI4BGXqtC0V9XdQ8iWiEUriy5ipY0QZdcmSixiUhKxbn1igpbaiduzDxM 8IYpvcRquxRiDfzopf6K31uzNJKysn8APSYqBi+3+RPVV4qa3ZF9kfnm8GbK7V9I6/W+ IAv0legOfZyRCd4CzETplzjl7CKqbfwMhWe0jdzKQhsIcX+vlSuVrTgd9Em9/Ajpi7yQ lECg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0ff5FmsR2u8LjxZ8nFEDoYAUd9BJ03hHHC/rQe7hLs8=; b=h9GBbAZBeVBn2l5iJdP3PRfaXPak06l07OvhtfD9hpS7bQ1CPaYqd2K8Kstm9JrdG0 CxryGJCikuw6H1YZ5opK8APmb95oAkoiGOiLbnRJp5+EIRT9+gJYBS6eyqh3IzQ61OcH 1pgwIJlwBWruVgJYn2iu4EWZVUhAXO/42LiACDiX8Uky7f429coo5Cm9Ee2FBRCbSpEN ba422qQitNvibZSf1YwbIkGwOUIajsNbzHsCaN8ECTEBXqkvrhRQeZEKvAnfzW9XQToR M1LYnbLppvefEzWfagrq0YvcX3hrJpBgef9AVoGVxYyOmvPr7jKmnny0eycgOFq6udur EFmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWm9msYzfIbNAIEH29UZxAEK4pMgTZxO7F/g6VxRDCs4aTDlgGX 3f9M4mrtyTWfGIrwekwWTKBM6k7ttJE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsPiy5s+trWUWh5rV+HN3Rh3EKJPfGegzWZp1pFFoijqeeFa5jIRS8uJ3ots5fEI82jtDM3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:54f:: with SMTP id 73mr32058156plf.329.1571096801690; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (97-113-7-119.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.7.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9sm15732155pjl.20.2019.10.14.16.46.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone? To: Lucien Murray-Pitts , QEMU Developers References: From: Richard Henderson Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:46:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/5/19 3:11 AM, Lucien Murray-Pitts wrote: > Hi folks, > > Whilst working on a m68k patch I noticed that the capstone in use today (3.0) > doesnt support the M68K and thus a hand turned disasm function is used.   > > The newer capstone (5.0) appears to support a few more CPU, inc. m68k. I don't see a capstone v5. The latest I see is v4.1. > Why we move to this newer capstone? I had some patches for that floating about in May, but it missed the merge window for qemu 4.1. Thanks for reminding me about them. r~