From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csurM-0008CX-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:24:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csurM-0004A7-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:24:44 -0400 References: <1487850673-26455-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1487850673-26455-6-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> From: Alexander Graf Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 5/5] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm: Reset GICv3 cpu interface registers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Vijay Kilari Cc: Marc Zyngier , Pavel Fedin , QEMU Developers , Vijaya Kumar K , Eric Auger , qemu-arm , Christoffer Dall On 02/23/2017 07:37 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 11:51, wrote: >> From: Vijaya Kumar K >> >> Reset CPU interface registers of GICv3 when CPU is reset. >> For this, ARMCPRegInfo struct is registered with one ICC >> register whose resetfn is called when cpu is reset. >> >> All the ICC registers are reset under one single register >> reset function instead of calling resetfn for each ICC >> register. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K >> --- >> hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell This patch breaks execution on 4.4 (SLES12 SP2) for me: $ ./aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -nographic -M virt,gic-version=host -enable-kvm -cpu host -kernel /boot/Image qemu-system-aarch64: KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR failed: No such device or address Group 6 attr 0x000000000000c664 Aborted (core dumped) If I revert it, it works again. Is that device attr something only newer kernels received? In that case, it needs to be guarded by a capability check. Alex