From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGnVA-0002ih-J9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:39:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGnV9-0002iE-6a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:39:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGnV9-0002iA-2w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:39:11 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGnV8-0004Xb-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:39:10 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2689614pyb.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:39:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:39:08 +0700 From: "Mulyadi Santosa" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <772369.37659.qm@web25706.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200801201511.10037.vapier@gentoo.org> <200801201727.01211.vapier@gentoo.org> <767364c50801201438j37245af9t6d7644f7d4a73d54@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi... If I may jump into the pool... > I plan to work around the MinGW issue by guarding the offending part by > "#ifdef GCC...", even if I have been told that it works only by chance > (but it works, whereas any other option I tried does not). Ehm, should we better wait a bit for fabrice to complete his code code generator? then we can be freed (totally?) from gcc version dependency? it's not that I ignore people's effort to make qemu gcc4 compatible...but I just think it will save us from more work in the future (making it always gcc 3 compatible) and thus progress to more demanding area like truly support SVM/VT, better SMP and so on. just 2 cents opinion... regards, Mulyadi.