From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JIEyV-0000Zl-AV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:11:27 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JIEyT-0000Yt-SG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:11:27 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIEyT-0000Yk-FV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:11:25 -0500
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1JIEyT-0001Qr-DW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:11:25 -0500
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so1907398nzc.37
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f284c33d0801241911h113ce3b4xc4df80eda3f47233@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:11:23 +0700
From: "Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Slow clock in guest OS
In-Reply-To: <8122F5B3F5384F6EB9822FC6673E6BA3@intranet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8122F5B3F5384F6EB9822FC6673E6BA3@intranet>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi...

On Jan 25, 2008 5:08 AM, Sergey Bychkov <sergb@unichrom.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't understand why clock in guest OS (Windows 2003) goes very slow.

Are you sure the rtc freq has been made to 1024?
# cat /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq
should yield 1024 before you ran qemu.

If yes, then we should hunt into another possibilities...

regards,

Mulyadi.