From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JUZBZ-0007WU-31
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:11:53 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JUZBX-0007WD-NW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:11:52 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUZBX-0007WA-GC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:11:51 -0500
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.170])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1JUZBX-0002tJ-5y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:11:51 -0500
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so2729564wff.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:11:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f284c33d0802271911j21d286fdr6fe3e2619fa30a0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:11:49 +0700
From: "Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug (?) related to kqemu and/or Minix3
In-Reply-To: <47C56134.5050206@fiit.stuba.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47C3E690.7040308@fiit.stuba.sk>
	<f284c33d0802261903w3ccfca87pd913921c2bb95d85@mail.gmail.com>
	<47C56134.5050206@fiit.stuba.sk>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi..

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Matej Kosik <kosik@fiit.stuba.sk> wrote:
>  I do not know. What I was trying to say is that it is weird if Minix (note that I was not meaning
>  Linux) works fine:
>  - - on bare hardware
>  - - on QEMU (without kqemu)
>  but does not work on QEMU with kqemu. Minix developers say that it is bug somewhere in kqemu.

Yup, I got your point. try to read kqemu technical document, there you
will see its technical limitation.

regards,

Mulyadi.