From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KHs6r-00027i-R0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:18:49 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KHs6p-000269-MM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:18:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44318 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KHs6p-000266-Ip
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:18:47 -0400
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.189]:61022)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1KHs6p-0003Kd-5D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:18:47 -0400
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y6so2068311tia.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f284c33d0807122018v39bc80aau339cf4a6efa2d36a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:18:44 +0700
From: "Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Small bug in documentation
In-Reply-To: <4878B1F6.9010700@email.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4878B1F6.9010700@email.it>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi...

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Pietro Battiston <toobaz@email.it> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If you take the file qemu-img.texi and look under "fmt" option, and
> more precisely under "raw", you read:
>
>                Use "qemu-img info" to know the real size used by the
> image or "ls -ls" on Unix/Linux.
>
> Actually, on my system (Ubuntu 8.04, ext3 filesystem), "ls -ls" gives
> the _fake_ size (the one reported as "virtual size" in qemu-img output).
>
> I think this is a mistake, or maybe "ls"' behaviour is not so standard.

Are you sure you're looking on the first column of "ls -ls" output?

regards,

Mulyadi.