From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LX8XB-0001RG-QD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:25:22 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LX8X9-0001P9-GU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:25:20 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LX8X9-0001Oy-6i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:25:19 -0500
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.173]:57142)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1LX8X8-0007u8-Sk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:25:19 -0500
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so50948wfa.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:25:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dec4146b0902091123n4d7e99f6m16cadac3a7ac8e88@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dec4146b0902070515y1d447578o6e5ffc29615ecf4d@mail.gmail.com>
	<f284c33d0902070933k5e10ec40k362dcd8d6b88d3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<dec4146b0902091123n4d7e99f6m16cadac3a7ac8e88@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:25:16 +0700
Message-ID: <f284c33d0902102225v1fd9bc18u6a6948b193b44afa@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] question about syscall
From: Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ricciantonio@gmail.com

Hi

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Antonio Ricci <ricciantonio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Muladi,
>
> some times ago someone said me to do something like this:
>
> /****************************************************/
> a piece of code handling interrupt in translate.c:
> case 0xcd: /* int N */
>
>       val = ldub_code(s->pc++);
>       /* asia: start */
>       if (val == 0x80){
>         gen_op_handle_syscall();
>         break;
>       }
>
>       if (s->vm86 && s->iopl != 3) {
>           gen_exception(s, EXCP0D_GPF, pc_start - s->cs_base);
>
>       } else {
>           gen_interrupt(s, val, pc_start - s->cs_base, s->pc - s->cs_base);
>       }
>       break;
>
> /*********************************************************/
>
>
> I can't understand why I have to intercept the case 0xcd. Can you explain
> me?

My guess is, 0xcd is the opcode of "int" instruction. Try to check
Intel instruction manual....

regards,

Mulyadi.