Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/8] Support disabling TCG on ARM

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 8/9/19 10:22 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Peter, Paolo, Alex, Thomas :)
> 
> On 7/2/19 4:08 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 20:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> $ git backport-diff -u v3 -r target-arm.next..v4
>>> Key:
>>> [----] : patches are identical
>>> [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
>>> [down] : patch is downstream-only
>>> The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively
>>>
> [skipping patches already applied...]
> 
>>> 004/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Restrict pre-ARMv7 cpus to TCG'
>>> 005/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Do not build pre-ARMv7 cpus when using KVM'
>>> 006/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Restrict R and M profiles to TCG'
>>> 007/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Do not build A/M-profile cpus when using KVM'
>>> 008/8:[----] [--] 'target/arm: Do not build TCG objects when TCG is off'
>>
>> I'm going to apply patches 1 and 2 to target-arm.next for rc0 (since
>> 2 is helpful to redhat downstream and taking 1 now reduces the
>> amount of code-movement patches you'll need to rebase). Patch 3
>> doesn't compile and 4-8 are rfc.
> 
> The remaining patches can be applied without conflict, so no need to
> respin (yet) IMO.
> 
> Paolo/Thomas, do you mind reviewing patches 5 and 7? They are kconfig
> related.
> 
> Peter/Alex, do you mind reviewing patches 4 and 6 first, then 5 and 7 (5
> and 7 can wait for Paolo/Thomas' review first).

Patches 4/6 were tagged 'RFC' for late 4.1 inclusion, so can be
considered normal patches once 4.2 dev cycle opens.