From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg3a5-0007mP-2K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:48:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg3a3-0007lZ-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:48:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg3a3-0007lI-8O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:48:07 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg3Ub-0000je-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:42:30 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so7039ugd for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:42:28 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SunOS Testing on latest SVN snapshot In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 4/23/07, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote: > Now, if I remember correclty about suns, you have to boot the correct slice > according to the architecture. > > It used to be something like one slice for sun4c, one for sun4d, one for > sun4m, one for sun4u, etc. > > Does the openboot32 properly grab the slice for sun4m? OpenBIOS tries :d slice.