From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpnbR-0005Vh-5W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpnbP-0005T6-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpnbP-0005Sp-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:47 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpnbP-0005qD-35 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:47 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so718536ugd for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 08:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:45:45 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] emulated lance device crashes in debian-sparc32 In-Reply-To: <200705201125.26929.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070519071656.74105a87@chirp> <20070520021123.7b01da02@chirp> <200705201125.26929.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: Mark Glines , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 5/20/07, Paul Brook wrote: > > > I think Qemu should reject -net user only. Currently that seems to > > > mean that there is no nic, but still the vlan is connected to slirp > > > stack. That does not make any sense. > > If you do this, do it properly and warn if any qemu vlans have a single device > attached. That is not correct either: -net user,vlan=0 -net socket,connect=1.2.3.4:1234. How about this rule: ((one or more guest devices in a vlan) and (zero with a warning? or more host devices)) or (no devices at all on either side)