From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ht6gt-0001ab-0W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:45:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ht6gq-0001aP-J6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:45:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht6gq-0001aM-Dv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:45:04 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1Ht6gp-00066s-Lq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:45:04 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d11so747765and
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2007 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580705291144p3869eb8dg96ac75fae14a3cbc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:44:39 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression bug
In-Reply-To: <2765066.1180444125665.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml26.mgt.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----=_Part_96643_1870211.1180464279378"
References: <2765066.1180444125665.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml26.mgt.cox.net>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: sol10x86@cox.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: risc@volumehost.com

------=_Part_96643_1870211.1180464279378
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
attached patch fixes the problem?

------=_Part_96643_1870211.1180464279378
Content-Type: text/x-diff; name=fix_subpage.diff; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Attachment-Id: f_f2apvgzl
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fix_subpage.diff"
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------=_Part_96643_1870211.1180464279378--