From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I4gY0-0002nn-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:15:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I4gXz-0002nb-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:15:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I4gXz-0002nY-1Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:15:47 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I4gXy-0005Am-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:15:46 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so723447uge for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:15:44 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANN: DetaolB v0.4 is released In-Reply-To: <20070630105105.GB644@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46d6db660706291658n4e267e6aoe6adee31524187a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070630105105.GB644@networkno.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, detaolb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 6/30/07, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Blue Swirl wrote: > > > > > On 6/30/07, Christian MICHON wrote: > > > > DetaolB aimed to be a "much-less-than-a-floppy" x86 linux live distro. > > > > Now, it's evolving more into "a-la-slax" type of distro. > > > > > > As the number of Sparc32 distributions keeps approaching zero, could you > > > consider porting DetaolB to non-x86 CPUs? > > > > Yes, please! > > The reason why distributions drop sparc32 is the unmaintained kernel. > Nobody stepped up for Linux kernel maintenance in the last years. > Debian managed to keep up a sort-of working kernel for the last > release, the people who put their time into it are disinclined to > repeat this exercise. But there is a difference in maintaining a kernel suitable for high quality distribution with over 18733 packages working in different real hardware, versus a test/evaluation distribution with <30 packages running on Qemu. I'd see that as an "enhanced qemu-tests.tar.gz".