qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 4G address space remapping on 64-bit host
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:48:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580707030048s242a60e0wdb60b3f8ead19218@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46857024.3050706@bellard.org>

On 6/29/07, Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org> wrote:
> The kqemu part could be quite simple. A new execution mode could be
> added so that:
>
> - shadow page table faults generate a specific signal in the user guest
> code.
> - A kqemu "syscall" callable from the user guest code could be used to
> do the equivalent of tlb_set_page(), tlb_flush_page() and tlb_flush().
>
> Note that I don't think it is worth using Xen for that. Modifying kqemu
> (or even KVM) should be more flexible. With kqemu it could also work on
> FreeBSD, Solaris, Windows and Linux.
>
> The more complicated part is to split QEMU in two parts : one part
> containing the translator (and maybe some devices) would be executed as
> guest user code in kqemu. The other part would be executed as a regular
> process to handle what is left (graphic, disk access, etc).

The first step could be execution of TB code from kqemu, memory
accesses could bypass the TLB.

> If TB where MMIO accesses are done are compiled specifically, I think it
> can be quite efficient.
>
> For the specific sparc32 case, I think that a better register window
> handling and a faster soft mmu code (using 4MB TLBs as it was proposed
> in a patch long ago) should already give an important speed boost (say a
> factor 1.5 to 2). The kqemu optimisation should give at least as much
> performance gain, depending on the ratio of instructions which do a
> memory access and on the number of TLB faults.

About register windows, it's strange that enabling REG_REGWPTR
mysteriously does not work.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-03  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-29  9:41 [Qemu-devel] 4G address space remapping on 64-bit host Blue Swirl
2007-06-29 10:15 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-06-29 16:48   ` Blue Swirl
2007-06-29 20:48     ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-07-03  7:48       ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2007-06-29 13:00 ` Paul Brook
2007-06-29 17:14   ` Gwenole Beauchesne
2007-06-29 21:03     ` Paul Brook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f43fc5580707030048s242a60e0wdb60b3f8ead19218@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).