From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILkHR-0000F0-RU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:41:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILkHQ-0000Eo-5f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:41:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILkHQ-0000El-08
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:41:12 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1ILkHP-0001u2-Ki
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:41:11 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so186351nfu
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580708161141g58e84dbfk8216623128dc7874@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:41:10 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] adding support for above 2giga for qemu. ( include
	patchs )
In-Reply-To: <1187107892.11302.31.camel@izike-desktop.qumranet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1187107892.11302.31.camel@izike-desktop.qumranet.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 8/14/07, Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com> wrote:
> anyway you have anyidea why it is working with kvm above 4giga and not
> with qemu??? can you look at how i did the mapping in qemu?

Kqemu is not compatible with >2G, does it change anything if you run
without kqemu?

Also the assembly versions of softmmu access functions would need
changing. To avoid that, you could try qemu on x86_64 or comment out
the line for ASM_SOFTMMU in target-i386/op.c.