From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1INwfh-00039u-9x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:21 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1INwff-00037i-9A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:20 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INwfe-00036L-Bz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:19 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1INwfd-0004jf-DE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:19:17 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so197066nfu
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580708221319k325a0e36kbd615864c528eac2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:19:14 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] SVM support
In-Reply-To: <46CC956B.2060002@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46CC956B.2060002@suse.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 8/22/07, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> - All interceptions (well, maybe I did oversee one or two)

Nice work! For better performance, you should do the op.c checks
statically at translation time (if possible).