From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: fix run of 32 bits Linux executables on 64 bits targets
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:47:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580710110847v612b83ccu969803ebb743b5d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071011151724.GD3379@networkno.de>
On 10/11/07, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> >>> J. Mayer wrote:
> >>>> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> >>>> were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
> >>>> bits target in linux user mode emulation.
> >>>> [...]
> >>> Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add 32 bit executable support to
> >>> a 64 bit target ? In the end you will need to write a 64 bit to 32 bit
> >>> linux syscall converter which would mean duplicating all the linux-user
> >>> code of the corresponding 32 bit target (think of ioctls with strutures,
> >>> signals frames, etc...).
> >> I would think this feature will be limited to platforms which can handle
> >> 32bit and 64bit binaries with a single personality.
> >
> > I am not sure it is a common case !
> >
> > However, I suggest to emulate a 32 bit user linux system with a 64 bit
> > guest CPU running in 32 bit compatibily mode. It would be useful to test 64
> > bit CPUs in 32 bit compatibility mode. The only required modification in
> > linux user is to rename target_ulong so that it can have a different size
> > of the CPU word default size.
>
> Doesn't work for MIPS64, since it doesn't quite have a compatibility mode
> in the traditional sense. It needs to retain 64bit register width when
> running N32 ABI binaries. (Thus the somewhat odd overrides I added for
> the preliminary N32 support.)
CPU registers (and storage for full width registers) would still be 64
bits. The ABI uses of target_ulong need to be changed to, for example
abi_ulong so that the size can be changed.
Sparc64 does not have a compatibility mode either (except for address
masking), it can run Sparc32 binaries because of the cleverly designed
instruction set. Ops use full 64 bits of a register, but there are two
sets of CPU flags, 32 and 64 bits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-10 7:42 [Qemu-devel] RFC: fix run of 32 bits Linux executables on 64 bits targets J. Mayer
2007-10-10 8:18 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-10 16:09 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 17:49 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-10 18:40 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-10 19:02 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 21:51 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-11 15:17 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-11 15:47 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2007-10-11 16:00 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-11 19:26 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-11 22:00 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-12 16:21 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 18:42 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-12 19:37 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 20:24 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-10 16:01 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 18:42 ` J. Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f43fc5580710110847v612b83ccu969803ebb743b5d6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).