From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ilfkt-0005BL-Ma
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:06:47 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ilfks-0005A2-9f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:06:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ilfks-00059s-6k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:06:46 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>)
	id 1Ilfkr-0004Ss-Eg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:06:45 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1IlfQm-0004Er-DI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:46:00 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so1047105nfu
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580710262345u1d158f4eh9c783fea57693523@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:45:58 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu host-utils.c
In-Reply-To: <20071024173726.GC6666@networkno.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <E1IkT5K-0007xn-ES@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<471F1C7F.8060003@bellard.org> <1193222136.16781.229.camel@rapid>
	<20071024173726.GC6666@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 10/24/07, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> - SPARC and Alpha look like they will break on 32bit hosts, they should
>   do multiplications the same way as the other 64bit targets.

I can't see how Sparc would break: smul and umul perform 32x32->64 bit
multiplications, Sparc64 mulx does 64x64->64 bit multiplications.
There is no overflow detection.