From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Disable implicit self-modifying code support for RISC CPUs
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580711040012s6bac616aybb0d1fe69a1b65b6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472CF299.9000104@bellard.org>
On 11/4/07, Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > RISC CPUs don't support self-modifying code unless the affected area
> > is flushed explicitly. This patch disables the extra effort for SMC.
> > The changes in this version would affect all CPUs except x86, but I'd
> > like to see if there are problems with some target, so that the
> > committed change can be limited. Without comments, I'll just disable
> > SMC for Sparc, as there are no problems. So please comment, especially
> > if you want to "opt in".
> >
> > For some reason, I can't disable all TB/TLB flushing, for example
> > there was already one line with TARGET_HAS_SMC || 1, but removing the
> > || 1 part causes crashing. Does anyone know why?
>
> With the current QEMU architecture, you cannot disable self-modifying
> code as you did. This is why I did not fully supported the
> TARGET_HAS_SMC flag. The problem is that the translator make the
> assumption that the RAM and the TB contents are consistent for example
> when handling exceptions. Suppressing this assumption is possible but
> requires more work.
I think the conclusion is that we would need some kind of emulator for
i-cache for any accurate emulation. And handling the boot loader may
need an uncached mode.
The performance benefit from disabling SMC is unnoticeable according
to my benchmarks. Adding a TB flush to i-cache flushing made things
worse. Moreover, SMC is hardly ever used on Sparc.
I'll just commit the debug statement fixes and the fix that separates
PAGE_READ from PAGE_EXEC for Sparc.
Maybe this issue should be documented in qemu-tech.texi, there are
also frequently some questions about caches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 20:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Disable implicit self-modifying code support for RISC CPUs Blue Swirl
2007-11-03 20:37 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-11-03 22:13 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-11-04 7:12 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2007-11-04 7:36 ` J. Mayer
2007-11-04 7:49 ` Blue Swirl
2007-11-03 23:30 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f43fc5580711040012s6bac616aybb0d1fe69a1b65b6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).