From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:32:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580807301032j2dc2b2fbmf6b53a5ebdf4504@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729195048.GC11061@minantech.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1852 bytes --]
On 7/29/08, Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:22:54PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:37:01AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>> The backdoor interface is deprecated (from a VMware perspective) and
> >>> is pretty terrible. I'll go through and do a more thorough review
> >>> of the patches Chris posted but one thing I already know I'd like to
> >>> see the
> >> Review my last submission I linked above then too.
> >>
> >
> > Applying the -uuid support without making use of that uuid anywhere
> > isn't very useful.
> >
>
> You can read it from monitor, so management software can benefit from
> it. And this will reduce my patch backlog :)
>
>
> >>> UUID plumbed through the SMBIOS tables for x86. That's a requirement
> >>> in my mind for adding a -uuid option. I see no harm in also
> >>> supporting the backdoor interface but the primary way to expose a
> >>> UUID should be SMBIOS.
> >>>
> >> I am not sure I understand what you mean. Currently SMBIOS tables are
> >> built by bochs bios and UUID backdoor is needed to fill in missing info.
> >>
> >
> > But that patch that got pushed into the Bochs BIOS was wrong.
> >
> > So here's what I'd like to see in order to apply these patches:
> >
> > 1) A new patch to the Bochs BIOS that used CMOS to pass a UUID (or
> > possibly an OF data structure as Blue Swirl suggested--although CMOS is
> > safer).
>
> We will run out of space in CMOS quickly if we will use it as qemu->bios
> communication channel. Is passing pointer to memory location (Blue Swirl
> suggestion) acceptable solution by everyone?
Here's a patch implementing a configuration ROM (probably in a bad
address) including a fake UUID. I skipped the more difficult parts
like kernel address etc.
[-- Attachment #2: pc_use_firmware_abi.diff --]
[-- Type: plain/text, Size: 5462 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 13:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 14:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 14:41 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:09 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:42 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 16:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 16:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 16:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 17:41 ` Blue Swirl
2008-07-28 16:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 19:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 20:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 20:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 20:40 ` Paul Brook
2008-07-28 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 6:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 15:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 19:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sebastian Herbszt
2008-07-28 15:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 16:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-29 19:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 19:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-30 17:32 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2008-08-05 14:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-08-06 2:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-06 16:26 ` Blue Swirl
2008-08-06 16:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-06 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sebastian Herbszt
2008-08-06 22:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 8:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-29 8:42 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:51 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f43fc5580807301032j2dc2b2fbmf6b53a5ebdf4504@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=clalance@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).