From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ30m-0004dS-F7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:34:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ30k-0004dD-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:34:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43986 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ30k-0004dA-PF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:34:18 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.173]:35289) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQ30k-0003BZ-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:34:18 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so3336462wfd.4 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:34:16 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] xen: groundwork for xen support In-Reply-To: <1217865045-10722-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1217865045-10722-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann On 8/4/08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > - allow xenpv machines run without disk and kernel specified > by adding a nodisk_ok field to QEMUMachine. Nice idea, this would be a useful feature by itself. > + $(XEN_OBJS) : CFLAGS += -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes These aren't needed for Xen. Though I wonder why at least -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes could not be added globally. > + if (-1 != xen_present) This style looks alien to me. Do you really find it readable?