From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KaYu0-0007lF-3H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:38:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KaYtv-0007ia-4p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:38:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40901 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaYtu-0007iQ-S2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:38:42 -0400
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:25342)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1KaYtt-0004Mj-Ld
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:38:42 -0400
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2394257wfd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580809020938m88a3787m9e27d705a2590f75@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:38:38 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5134] sh4: Add R2D-PLUS FPGA support.
In-Reply-To: <E1KaYaU-0004Es-Ou@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <E1KaYaU-0004Es-Ou@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 9/2/08, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
>  +static CPUReadMemoryFunc *r2d_fpga_readfn[] = {
>  +    r2d_fpga_read,
>  +    r2d_fpga_read,
>  +    invalid_read,

You could use NULL instead, then 32 bit access would trigger
unassigned memory access routine.