From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KcPf6-0004ZF-Cu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:11:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KcPf4-0004YT-NZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:11:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37634 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPf4-0004YQ-In
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:11:02 -0400
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:26147)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1KcPf4-0000pf-9j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:11:02 -0400
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so1264555wfd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580809071211p4134df99w760385dcb748f65e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:11:00 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH 2/13] Refactor and enhance
	break/watchpoint API
In-Reply-To: <48C33916.6010608@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <486CF559.5090805@siemens.com> <48AC2E09.3030405@siemens.com>
	<48AC2EE9.8050803@siemens.com> <48C33916.6010608@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 9/7/08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Does anyone have any objections to this series?  It literally touches every
> architectures so I don't want to commit it without some Ack'ing for the
> appropriate architecture maintainers.

Sparc part is OK.

+
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+const int xlat_gdb_type[] = {
+    [GDB_WATCHPOINT_WRITE]  = BP_GDB | BP_MEM_WRITE,

"static" missing.