From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KeDz5-0006i9-8x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:07:11 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KeDz4-0006hR-MQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:07:10 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KeDz4-0006h9-IU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:07:10 -0400
Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.156]:11853)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1KeDz4-00049U-N6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:07:10 -0400
Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 3so371048yxi.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580809121207u6a0b1008k178c7e42ff9f972@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:07:07 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH/RFC] provide --accel option
In-Reply-To: <1221245233-26152-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1221245233-26152-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 9/12/08, Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com> wrote:
> The --accel option will provide us the ability of defining which
>  accelerator to pick at run time. It has the advantage of not using
>  the not-well-accepted constructor directives, and also, of stabilishing
>  a way to define priorities among accelerators.
>
>  The ones registered first, are tried first.

>  +            case QEMU_OPTION_accel:
>  +                {
>  +                    int i;
>  +                    for (i = 0; i < sizeof(available_accels)/sizeof(void *); i++) {

ARRAY_SIZE(available_accels)?

>  +                        if (!strcasecmp(optarg, available_accels[i]->name))
>  +                            register_qemu_accel(available_accels[i]);
>  +                    }
>  +                }
>  +                break;