From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkL1O-0007HL-Ch for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkL1N-0007GK-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53720 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkL1N-0007G1-EO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:49 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com ([209.85.217.19]:51037) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkL1N-00077H-IC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:49 -0400 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so11525320gxk.10 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:50:46 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Can't boot my sparc system anymore In-Reply-To: <48E01BA0.50301@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48DFC2A5.6040305@earthlink.net> <48DFCB20.7090106@earthlink.net> <48E01BA0.50301@earthlink.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 9/29/08, Robert Reif wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: > > > > > Sorry, I had forgotten about this. Do you get the same result with > > -prom-env 'boot-args=Linux console=ttyS0 video=tcxfb:off'? > > > > Or just -prom-env 'boot-args=Linux' and -nographic? > > > > > > > > > No matter how I try to boot right now, it mostly just hangs in SILO using > 100% cpu. > > It did finally boot a few times but it took a long time and ran slow. > qemu-g boots fine but the test I use which is just standard debian etch > installed to a disk image doesn't boot reliably anymore. This is a new > regression. Could you please bisect? > As a side note, this same disk image on the same computer used to display > around 500 bogo mips at the first of this year but has steadily decreased > to > around 125 bogo mips. This is probably caused by TCG conversion. I have not focused much on performance and there are some things that could be more optimal, like condition flag handling.