From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KlTWl-0007I9-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:07:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KlTWh-0007Ho-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:07:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53742 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KlTWh-0007Hl-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:07:51 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.191]:58027) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KlTWg-0000b7-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:07:50 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m61so896244rnd.8 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:07:49 +0300 From: "Blue Swirl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] Snapshots not bound to an architecture? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Hi, While testing the savevm/loadvm functions, I noticed that it's possible to attempt to load a snapshot made for entirely different architecture. There are a lot of warnings, of course. Could we prevent this somehow? Or is there a use case for this, for example loading a snapshot made on i386 to an x86_64 emulator?