From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kmv2R-0000Wu-Ov
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kmv2Q-0000Vx-3g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:35 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55893 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kmv2P-0000Vr-Ls
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:33 -0400
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.190]:56550)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1Kmv2P-00070O-43
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:42:33 -0400
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so4280042mue.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580810061142u2fcf6d8nc1b527230703692d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:42:31 +0300
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48EA4E5D.50708@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <48EA4E5D.50708@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Fire SIGIO when IO requests are
	completed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 10/6/08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Hi Blue Swirl,
>
>  Can you test the attached patch with sparc-softmmu?  Better yet, do you
> have an image, or a recipe for an image that I could use to try and
> reproduce the problem?  The sparc test code on the QEMU website just uses a
> ram disk so the regression isn't evident with it.

Your patch fixes the slowness, great!

Please put the prototype of enable_sigio_timer to a .h file somewhere,
I get a warning with -Wmissing-prototypes.