From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KvFy8-0004Ij-Ip
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:40:36 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KvFy7-0004I8-5k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:40:36 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33700 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvFy7-0004I5-20
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:40:35 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251]:43772)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1KvFy6-000128-Li
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:40:34 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so13510and.130
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f43fc5580810291140p6de7ad36ua4170c3e472fba8a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:40:32 +0200
From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFT] Update i386-dis.c from binutils 2.17
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0810290952n681a400dh96e7492d523f956@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f43fc5580810271129n1344d692x8088e1b297e6ec3d@mail.gmail.com>
	<761ea48b0810290952n681a400dh96e7492d523f956@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 10/29/08, Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > This very lightly tested patch updates i386-dis.c from binutils 2.17.
>  > If someone can test it more thoroughly and declare that the patch is
>  > useful and it does not break anything, I may apply it.
>
>
> Out of curiosity why did you base it on 2.17?  This lacks 50 commits
>  that were done before the switch to GPLv3.  I can understand one
>  might feel uncomfortable using a random CVS revision, I would feel
>  so :)

Laziness, I already had 2.17 at hand. If the patch proves useless, not
too much time have been wasted.