From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOFj-0001GA-9p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:58:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOFg-0001Fi-GB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:58:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49081 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOFg-0001Ff-Cx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:58:52 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:44713) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LMOFf-0000JZ-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:58:52 -0500 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so21325354bwz.10 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:58:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:54:44 +0200 From: "Blue Swirl" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix 64 bit issue in slirp In-Reply-To: <20090112142807.GN3267@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20090112142807.GN3267@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 1/12/09, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov Great, but did you really fix all pointer accesses, including the port number stuff? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-10/msg00542.html