From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LMns4-0003ce-Ub
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:20:13 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LMns3-0003bt-EB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:20:12 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53740 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMns3-0003bo-9W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:20:11 -0500
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.170]:7454)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1LMns2-00009Y-Ut
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:20:11 -0500
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so143016wfd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:20:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DEB4E809-4CA7-447E-BC5D-BBA3A384CA2A@adacore.com>
References: <6DAAE056-B357-4760-AF7D-3E2112240EDD@adacore.com>
	<f43fc5580901130828p545c19f1i2f291265fcb6ab31@mail.gmail.com>
	<DEB4E809-4CA7-447E-BC5D-BBA3A384CA2A@adacore.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:20:10 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5580901131020k24a4833dh5b13bd88f71b781c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sparc gdbserver: fix number of regs
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 1/13/09, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
>  On Jan 13, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>
> > Excellent! Now my cross-gdb also works.
> >
>
>  You're welcome.
>
>
> > Maybe Sparc64 has the same problem?
> >
>
>  I haven't built sparc64 but I can check gdbserver.c with gdb code.

It looks like Sparc64 is correct. The number is defined in gdb sources
in gdb/sparc64-tdep.c (SPARC64_NUM_REGS).