From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVpwb-00061s-Q3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:22:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVpwb-00061X-6W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:22:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38528 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVpwb-00061R-18 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:22:13 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:50364) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVpwa-0004Ma-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:22:12 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so794093fga.8 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 08:22:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090207141803.GA6533@volta.aurel32.net> References: <20090207141803.GA6533@volta.aurel32.net> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 18:22:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Mac99 (CHRP?) support From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2/7/09, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi! > > > This set of patches adds basic support for Mac99 Qemu machine, > > > As you ask the question in the subject, this machine is a NewWorld > machine, and not a CHRP one. I think we don't really want to provide a > CHRP emulated machine, so the best is probably to rename ppc_chrp.c into > ppc_newworld.c. True. I think RS6000 series were closest to CHRP, not iMac. The rename does not affect OHW status, so it could be done immediately. > > provided by ppc_chrp.c. I've used the device tree of iMac DV ('99) as > > reference: > > http://penguinppc.org/historical/dev-trees-html/imac-dv-99.html > > > > The patches changes the machine to use OpenBIOS instead of OHW and > > otherwise breaks OHW assumptions. On OpenBIOS side there are still > > some missing bits. > > > > Comments welcome. > > > Great work. > > I gave a quick look at the patches, they looks fine. However I still > experience some problem with the PowerMac IDE emulation, especially with > recent kernels, so until it is fixed (Laurent is working on that) I > think we should keep the CMD646 as a default. OK=C2=B8 I'll change that part and send new patches.