From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld9Jc-0000By-4q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:28:12 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld9Jb-0000AH-2j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:28:11 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48049 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld9Ja-00009u-Q0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:28:10 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:51308)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1Ld9Ja-0003NB-E6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:28:10 -0500
Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so1132831fxm.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:28:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws>
References: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:08 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5580902271228h17cb31f2x575d086e8642bf47@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release?
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, The OpenBIOS Mailinglist <openbios@openbios.org>

On 2/27/09, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective.  For x86, I think
> things are looking pretty good.  There are a couple outstanding patches that
> need more review (like the CVE fix) but I think we'll be ready in a few
> days.
>
>  How are the other architectures looking?  Are there any major bug fixes
> people are working on?  PPC is now fully converted to OpenBIOS, right?

Yes, except for PREP.

There are recent patches to make PPC64 work that should be committed
in the coming days. That would be a nice addition but not critical.

We have also discussed about making also an OpenBIOS (1.0) release,
the previous release candidate (1.0RC1) is more than year old. It
would be great to release Qemu with 1.0 OpenBIOS.

Overall, there should be an update of the OpenBIOS images, otherwise
Sparc32 and I think PPC32 are ready. Sparc64 will not be without major
miracles in any case. PPC64 case may be interesting.