From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist <openbios@openbios.org>,
Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:23:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43fc5580902271323r2347515dk9b9e764ad9986d73@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A8549D.9010703@codemonkey.ws>
On 2/27/09, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> > On 2/27/09, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective. For x86, I
> think
> > > things are looking pretty good. There are a couple outstanding patches
> that
> > > need more review (like the CVE fix) but I think we'll be ready in a few
> > > days.
> > >
> > > How are the other architectures looking? Are there any major bug fixes
> > > people are working on? PPC is now fully converted to OpenBIOS, right?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yes, except for PREP.
> >
> >
>
> Is anyone working on converting PREP? Any ETA?
Qemu side would be easy, but OpenBIOS side would need a lot of work.
I'd guess days to a few weeks. But I think Aurelien also mentioned
that PREP is not so interesting target anyway. Still, the original
problem was distributing OHW without sources being available and then
one machine would still depend on OHW.
> > There are recent patches to make PPC64 work that should be committed
> > in the coming days. That would be a nice addition but not critical.
> >
> > We have also discussed about making also an OpenBIOS (1.0) release,
> > the previous release candidate (1.0RC1) is more than year old. It
> > would be great to release Qemu with 1.0 OpenBIOS.
> >
> >
>
> It would be great to have a 1.0 release for our release, but do you have an
> ETA on when that would be? It would be very good to get out a QEMU release
> within the next few days to match up with the upcoming set of distro
> releases.
The sources are IMHO ready (except maybe for a quick PPC64 commit),
but we need Stefan for web site release management. Stefan, would this
weekend be OK for 1.0 release?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 17:37 [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release? Anthony Liguori
2009-02-27 18:37 ` Andreas Färber
2009-02-27 18:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-27 19:20 ` malc
2009-02-27 19:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-27 21:55 ` malc
2009-03-01 17:41 ` Andreas Färber
2009-03-02 10:15 ` Alexander Graf
2009-02-27 20:28 ` Blue Swirl
2009-02-27 21:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-27 21:23 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2009-02-27 21:28 ` [OpenBIOS] " Stefan Reinauer
2009-02-28 20:32 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f43fc5580902271323r2347515dk9b9e764ad9986d73@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=openbios@openbios.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stepan@coresystems.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).