From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdABE-0002cb-3Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:23:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LdABB-0002Yj-IO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:23:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41457 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LdABB-0002YT-F2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:23:33 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.218.171]:55325) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdABA-0003zI-TI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:23:33 -0500 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1119059bwz.34 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:23:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49A8549D.9010703@codemonkey.ws> References: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws> <49A8549D.9010703@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:23:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release? From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist , Stefan Reinauer Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2/27/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: > > > On 2/27/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective. For x86, I > think > > > things are looking pretty good. There are a couple outstanding patches > that > > > need more review (like the CVE fix) but I think we'll be ready in a few > > > days. > > > > > > How are the other architectures looking? Are there any major bug fixes > > > people are working on? PPC is now fully converted to OpenBIOS, right? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, except for PREP. > > > > > > Is anyone working on converting PREP? Any ETA? Qemu side would be easy, but OpenBIOS side would need a lot of work. I'd guess days to a few weeks. But I think Aurelien also mentioned that PREP is not so interesting target anyway. Still, the original problem was distributing OHW without sources being available and then one machine would still depend on OHW. > > There are recent patches to make PPC64 work that should be committed > > in the coming days. That would be a nice addition but not critical. > > > > We have also discussed about making also an OpenBIOS (1.0) release, > > the previous release candidate (1.0RC1) is more than year old. It > > would be great to release Qemu with 1.0 OpenBIOS. > > > > > > It would be great to have a 1.0 release for our release, but do you have an > ETA on when that would be? It would be very good to get out a QEMU release > within the next few days to match up with the upcoming set of distro > releases. The sources are IMHO ready (except maybe for a quick PPC64 commit), but we need Stefan for web site release management. Stefan, would this weekend be OK for 1.0 release?