From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LftHh-00061W-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:57:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LftHf-00061H-9H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:57:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57577 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LftHf-00061E-64 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:57:31 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.218.171]:56131) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LftHe-0006vQ-Nl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:57:30 -0500 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so572182bwz.34 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:57:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1236353765-4484-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> References: <1236353765-4484-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1236353765-4484-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:57:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: Blue Swirl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/11] PPC64: Implement slbmte Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 3/6/09, Alexander Graf wrote: > In order to modify SLB entries on recent PPC64 machines, the slbmte > instruction is used. > void ppc_store_sr (CPUPPCState *env, int srnum, target_ulong value) > { > LOG_MMU("%s: reg=%d " ADDRX " " ADDRX "\n", > __func__, srnum, value, env->sr[srnum]); > - if (env->sr[srnum] != value) { > + if (env->mmu_model & POWERPC_MMU_64) { > + uint64_t rb = 0, rs = 0; This part does not compile because POWERPC_MMU_64 is not defined, is the patch sequence correct?