From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LiB5b-0005GL-9R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:22:31 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LiB5W-0005DP-Ps
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:22:30 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50015 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LiB5W-0005DE-6P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:22:26 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f162.google.com ([209.85.218.162]:61748)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1LiB5V-0002gQ-RV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:22:26 -0400
Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so210628bwz.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49B79200.5020000@bandsman.co.uk>
References: <200903101837.n2AIb6L8005105@bandsman.co.uk>
	<49B79200.5020000@bandsman.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:22:23 +0200
Message-ID: <f43fc5580903131022t4d79950dw9cf88ca870a6931d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Any update on SPARC/Solaris host?
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 3/11/09, Nigel Horne <njh@bandsman.co.uk> wrote:
> > There are still problems with the i386,
> >
>
>  For one thing, networking support for Solaris/x86 as a guest broke a few
> weeks ago.

I meant any x86 guest on Sparc host, the problems I was talking about
are in the low level Sparc TCG host support.

You probably mean Solaris/x86 guest on x86 host so your problems are
related to generic networking or x86 device emulation.