From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lo1Qv-00006V-Sp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:16:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lo1Qr-0008Vy-Fb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:16:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39710 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lo1Qr-0008Vv-5e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:16:37 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.218.172]:53424)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1Lo1Qq-0008EX-Rv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:16:37 -0400
Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1538936bwz.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090325224714.853788328@amt.cnet>
References: <20090325224714.853788328@amt.cnet>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:16:35 +0300
Message-ID: <f43fc5580903291316p38393a3cu8da53db1c8c6cd6e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 00/10] iothread (candidate for inclusion)
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 3/26/09, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> This version is simplified thanks to the removal of CPU_INTERRUPT_EXIT.
>
>  There are two pending issues: vm_stop() from ENOSPC handling and GDB contexes.
>  IMO those can be worked while testing is performed by developers.
>
>  KVM SMP support is missing, but most of the infra required is present, so
>  it should be relatively simple.
>
>  There's also lots of room for TCG perf improvements.
>
>  Tested with target-x86_64 and target-ppc.

With the updated patch #3, Sparc32 also works.

I think I see a minor performance gain on a dual core host.